|
Comparison of 2D reference against 3D 7× k-t SENSE and 3D 10× k-t SENSE images (n = 6). |
||||
| LV EDV (ml) |
LV ESV (ml) |
LV mass (g) |
LVEF (%) |
|
|
|
||||
| 2D mean ± SD |
145.8 ± 25.9 |
63.3 ± 19.1 |
95.4 ± 18.1 |
57.2 ± 5.9 |
|
|
||||
| 3D 7× k-t mean ± SD |
138.3 ± 26.2 |
62.3 ± 20.5 |
90.9 ± 18.6 |
60.9 ± 10.7 |
| Bias (95% C.I.) |
7.4 (-14.6; 29.4) |
1.1 (-12.8; 14.9) |
4.4 (-14.4; 23.3) |
-3.7 (-26.7; 19.4) |
| Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) |
0.87 (0.64–1.00) |
0.96 (0.88–1.00) |
0.84 (0.56–1.00) |
0.88 (0.67–1.00) |
|
|
||||
| 3D 10× k-t mean ± SD |
134.3 ± 25.8 |
63.9 ± 22.0 |
92.7 ± 17.2 |
53.7 ± 8.0 |
| Bias (95% C.I.) |
11.5 (-16.1; 39.0) |
-0.6 (-20.1; 18.9) |
2.7 (-13.5; 18.9) |
3.6 (-1.7; 8.8) |
| Lin's coefficient (95% C.I.) |
0.77 (0.41–1.00) |
0.89 (0.69–1.00) |
0.88 (0.67–1.00) |
0.81 (0.58–1.00) |
Maredia et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2008 10:27 doi:10.1186/1532-429X-10-27 |
||||